- Home
- How We Score
What SafeBoosting Pays For, and What It Logs
Every rating on this site starts the same way: I pay for the service like any other customer, from an account I own, and watch what happens to it. Across 265 paid test orders, each one logged from checkout to the moment a rank actually moves, that record is the only evidence that earns a number here. The full set gets re-audited monthly, last on July 24, 2026, because a service that handled logins carefully in spring can quietly change hands by summer. No brand pays for its place, and none is allowed to.
Inside the Scoring Model
The Trust Score runs from 0 to 100 and comes out of five weighted inputs, applied in the same proportions to every service I cover so nobody gets a private formula. Safety and account handling carries the most weight, 35 percent of the total, for a plain reason: a boost that lands your rank but leaves your login exposed or trips a penalty has taken more than it gave. Completion reliability and speed follows at 25 percent, then pricing transparency and verified user sentiment at 15 percent each, with support quality at 10 percent. A shop can post quick finishes and still settle into the Fair range if it treats your credentials as an afterthought.
| Input | Weight | How we measure it |
|---|---|---|
| Account protection | 35% | Whether the booster stays in offline or appear-offline mode, connects through a VPN matched to your region, how your password is held and whether it is reset once the job ends, and how plainly the service states the ToS risk before you pay. |
| Finishing on time | 25% | Whether my paid orders actually finished, started when promised and reached the agreed rank, alongside any mid-job pauses, booster swaps or gaps between what I ordered and what turned up on the account. |
| Pricing clarity | 15% | Whether the checkout price matches the quote, how the number holds across repeat price checks, whether add-on fees appear late in the flow, and whether refund conditions are written down rather than promised over chat. |
| Verified reviews | 15% | Reviews I can tie back to a genuine purchase, screened for coordinated posting, and how the service answers public complaints; a steady pattern tells me far more than a raw star count. |
| Support experience | 10% | How fast and how knowledgeably support clears ordinary tickets, weighed against one deliberately awkward question per service to see how staff respond once the easy script runs out. |
What Gets Verified
- Orders I paid for. All 265 orders behind these ratings went through on my own money, under accounts that look like any other buyer, with nothing flagged as press. I log every step from checkout to the final rank, so the timeline stands as evidence instead of memory.
- Checking who plays. For each order I check who actually played it, matching the profile and recent match history against the account, and note whether they kept offline mode and a region-matched connection the whole way through rather than only at the start.
- Repeat price checks. I re-price a fixed basket of the same orders on a schedule, which surfaces the quiet increases and late checkout fees that a single visit would never expose.
- Screening the reviews. Public reviews get screened for burst posting and duplicated wording before they count, and I read the complaints closely, since how a service handles an angry customer reveals more than a wall of five-star praise.
Reading the Tiers
Those totals fall into four bands: 90 to 100 reads as Excellent, 75 to 89 as Good, 60 to 74 as Fair, and anything below 60 as Poor.
Independence Rules
Nobody buys placement here, and every order comes out of my own budget. Three rules keep it that way:
- Placement is never for sale. No service can pay, trade or barter its way into a higher score or a better spot, and none has been offered the chance to try.
- Orders go in anonymously, on accounts that read like ordinary customers, so a service treats my test exactly as it would treat you on a normal day.
- Every service runs through the identical checklist and the same five weights, whether I expect to like it or not, so the ranking reflects the method and not my mood.
Who Runs the Tests
I am Ethan Cole, Lead Reviewer at Safe Boosting. I climbed to Immortal in Valorant before I started doing this, which is where the habit of watching for penalties first came from. Every one of the 265 test orders on this site sits on an account I own and pay for myself, and I track ban and penalty outcomes on those accounts for months afterward, re-checking each service's safety practices on a rolling schedule instead of trusting a single clean run.
Fixing Errors
I get things wrong sometimes, and I would rather fix it than defend it. If a price, a claim or a test result on any page looks off, email corrections@safeboosting.net with the page URL and what you believe is wrong, and I will re-check it against my order logs and post an update wherever the record backs you up.